Sounds good! for Article I, it is WA affairs, as part of international policy can fall to either of the three parties, in the form of secretary of state. We also should come up with the region name, and name all the documents after it, because calling it saxon government framework, or justice constitution, cant work, because we will be united. So, we need a new name for the Region, and all the official documents.

I've been wracking my brain for a new name that crosses our two, something similar to what you have now but with Justice in it, like "Pact of Saxon-Justice". But like you said, we would be united, so I feel we should have something totally new to united under.

Also I will add your edit

I am just brainstorming now, nothing official

The Pact of Hessen-Saxon Justice

The Justice of Hesse-Saxony

etc...

The Justician Pact of Hesse Saxony...

The United Nations of Saxon-Justice?

I like it, but there is a Reason why the World Assembly is named what it is now... The Un dogged on them to stop, I doubt anything will happened to us, so that could work.

The Union of Saxon-Justice?

We could shorten it to the "Union of Saxon-Justice"?

I like the way you think

What was the origin for the name Hesse-Saxony?

The Pact of Hesse Saxony

Thank you

That works

Well, everything looks fine and dandy, as soon as the agreed term limit is put in article four, the Party of Hesse Saxony will be ready to hold a referenda.

It has been added

Alright, everything looks to be in order, as soon as you confirm that you are ready, and that a referenda will be held in your party, we will begin ours.

Our party will have a "yes" "no" vote, and the simple majority will win.

We are ready, we will begin our referenda

The only that came to my mind is the party system between Justice and Saxony. I read that you two already discussed it. However for future members I propose that we rid of all labels between Justice and Saxony save the name. If we are to merge into one region we mustn't label ourselves as individuals anymore but as one united region. Any WA dealings understandably do not have to pertain to former Saxony members and will be overseen by members of Justice. However it should be the individual choice of future members and they should not have to identify as one or the other for said choice. After the merge we will be one region twice as strong as before and should focus solely on ourselves as a whole.

I would say stick with the party system for now as a sort of transitional phase and then we will phase it out as we settle in

and in the meantime, new people can choose to be independent.

So keep the party system only until positions of power have been reassigned? 

eventually itll be like the secretary of state situation, where the position is temporarely reserved for one party, and then opens up next term.

maybe after a term or so, and we see how it is we could change it. 

In time we should delude from the parties altogether. New members that come in during the transition phase will be marked independent. Yet after the transitions are complete we are one great region.

And once all of our documents have been redrafted. While I feel it is important to maintain a proper disbursement between the natives of each, I agree it needs to be phased out to united us beneath one banner.

I do like the idea of a party system at some point though.

We will set the date for the first regular elections after we get settled in, and all.

Agreed